BXU Logo

Buxoro Xalqaro
Universiteti

9-tom, 1-son, b. 448–453, Nashr: 2026-09-21

TA’LIMDA ADOLAT VA TENGLIK TAMOYILLARI: FALSAFIY-AXLOQIY TAHLIL

ПРИНЦИПЫ СПРАВЕДЛИВОСТИ И РАВЕНСТВА В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: ФИЛОСОФСКО-ЭТИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ

PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY IN EDUCATION: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS

  • Azizova Mohira Anvarovna — Jismoniy madaniyat va gumanitar fanlar kafedrasi katta o’qituvchisi, Muhammad Al-Xorazmiy nomidagi Toshkent axborot texnologiyalari universiteti · ORCID: 0009-0002-1184-712X

To'liq matn (PDF)

Annotatsiya

Maqolada ta’limda adolat va tenglik tamoyillarining falsafiy-axloqiy asoslari tahlil qilinadi. Ta’lim inson qadr-qimmatini ro‘yobga chiqaruvchi va boshqa ko‘plab imkoniyatlarga yo‘l ochuvchi asosiy ijtimoiy ne’mat sifatida qaralib, unga bo‘lgan huquqning haqiqiy amalga oshirilishi bevosita adolat masalasi bilan bog‘liqligi asoslanadi. Maqolada formal tenglik va real tenglik o‘rtasidagi farq, imkoniyatlar tengligi, jarayondagi adolat va natijadagi tenglik masalalari hamda ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy, hududiy, raqamli va inklyuziv tengsizlik ko‘rinishlari yoritilgan. Adolatning egalitar, proporsional, meritokratik, rawlscha va imkoniyatlarga asoslangan konsepsiyalari ta’lim kontekstida qiyosiy tahlil qilingan.

Аннотация

В статье анализируются философско-этические основы принципов справедливости и равенства в образовании. Образование рассматривается как основное социальное благо, обеспечивающее реализацию человеческого достоинства и открывающее путь к множеству других возможностей, в связи с чем обосновывается, что действительная реализация права на образование непосредственно связана с проблемой справедливости. Раскрываются различие между формальным и реальным равенством, вопросы равенства возможностей, справедливости процесса и равенства результатов, а также социально-экономические, территориальные, цифровые и инклюзивные формы неравенства. Проведён сравнительный анализ эгалитарной, пропорциональной, меритократической, ролзианской и основанной на возможностях концепций справедливости в контексте образования.

Abstract

This article analyzes the philosophical and ethical foundations of the principles of justice and equality in education. Education is considered a fundamental social good that enables the realization of human dignity and provides access to numerous other opportunities, and it is argued that the genuine realization of the right to education is directly connected with the issue of justice. The article examines the distinction between formal equality and substantive equality, equality of opportunity, procedural justice and equality of outcomes, as well as various forms of socioeconomic, regional, digital, and inclusive inequality. Egalitarian, proportional, meritocratic, Rawlsian, and opportunity-based conceptions of justice are comparatively analyzed in the context of education.

Kalit so'zlar: ta’lim, adolat, tenglik, imkoniyatlar tengligi, inklyuziv ta’lim, ijtimoiy adolat, axloq falsafasi, inson qadri, ta’lim siyosati, pedagogik etika, aksiologiya

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education: All Means All. - Paris: UNESCO, 2020. - 424 p.
  2. UNESCO. Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. - Paris: UNESCO, 2021. - 186 p.
  3. UNICEF. Education, Children on the Move and Inclusion in Education: Lessons Learned and Scalable Solutions to Accelerate Inclusion in National Education Systems and Enhance Learning Outcomes. - New York: UNICEF, 2022.
  4. OECD. Equity and Inclusion in Education: Finding Strength through Diversity. - Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. - 372 p. - DOI: 10.1787/e9072e21-en.
  5. OECD. PISA 2022 Results. Volume I: The State of Learning and Equity in Education. - Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. - 492 p. - DOI: 10.1787/53f23881-en.
  6. Marrero G. A., Palomino J. C., Sicilia G. Inequality of opportunity in educational achievement in Western Europe: contributors and channels // The Journal of Economic Inequality. - 2024. - Vol. 22. - P. 383–410. - DOI: 10.1007/s10888-023-09595-5.
  7. Dimopoulos K., Koutsampelas C. Towards a new approach for understanding educational inequality: The Sen–Bourdieu-Bernstein theoretical framework // International Journal of Educational Research. - 2024. - Vol. 125. - Article 102347. - DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102347.
  8. Darling-Hammond L. Reinventing Systems for Equity // ECNU Review of Education. - 2024. - Vol. 7, No. 2. - DOI: 10.1177/20965311241237238.
  9. Zheng Z., Jiang S., Cui R. Remote Learning and Educational Inequality // Journal of Educational Technology Systems. - 2024. - Vol. 53, No. 12. - DOI: 10.1177/10591478241272084.
  10. González-Betancor S. M., López-Puig A. J., Cardenal M. E. Digital inequality at home: The school as compensatory agent // Computers & Education. - 2021. - Vol. 168. - Article 104195. - DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104195.
  11. Rochmes J. Educational inequality as a consequence and cause of race // Sociological Forum. - 2024. - Vol. 39, No. 3. - P. 231–249. - DOI: 10.1111/socf.13016.
  12. Lee J.-S., Stacey M. Fairness perceptions of educational inequality: The effects of self-interest and neoliberal orientations // The Australian Educational Researcher. - 2024. - Vol. 51. - P. 1215–1237. - DOI: 10.1007/s13384-023-00636-6.
  13. Reay D. Measuring and understanding contemporary English educational inequalities // Oxford Open Economics. - 2024. - Vol. 3, Supplement 1. - P. i861–i878. - DOI: 10.1093/ooec/odad027.
  14. OECD. Education at a Glance 2024: OECD Indicators. - Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. - DOI: 10.1787/c00cad36-en.
  15. World Bank. The State of Learning Poverty: 2023 Update. - Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023.