10-tom, 1-son, b. 243–246, Nashr: 2026-10-08

ILOVA KONSTRUKSIYA ELEMENTLARINING BADIIY MATNLARDA YOYILISH DARAJASI (INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARI MISOLIDA)

СТЕПЕНЬ РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИЯ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ ПРИСОЕДИНИТЕЛЬНЫХ КОНСТРУКЦИЙ В ХУДОЖЕСТВЕННЫХ ТЕКСТАХ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ АНГЛИЙСКОГО И УЗБЕКСКОГО ЯЗЫКОВ)

THE DEGREE OF EXPANSION OF THE ELEMENTS OF ATTACHED CONSTRUCTIONS IN LITERARY TEXTS (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK)

• Daminov Jamshid Zafar o’g’li — Navoiy davlat universiteti, o’qituvchi · ORCID: 0009-0008-7166-7765

To'liq matn (PDF)

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi badiiy matnlarda ilova konstruksiyalari tarkibidagi elementlarning matn bo‘ylab qo‘llanish xususiyatlari qiyosiy nuqtayi nazardan o‘rganiladi. Tadqiqot doirasida ilovali elementlarning gapdagi sintaktik o‘rni, ularning struktur jihatdan kengayish shakllari, mazmuniy-axborot yuklamasi hamda badiiy matn tarkibida joylashish va tarqalish xususiyatlariga alohida e’tibor qaratiladi. Shu bilan birga, mazkur birliklarning kommunikativ tuzilmani shakllantirishdagi ishtiroki, axborotning zichligini ta’minlashdagi roli va turli uslubiy vazifalarni amalga oshirish imkoniyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Ingliz va o‘zbek badiiy matnlari materiallari asosida olib borilgan tahlil natijalari ilovali elementlarning har ikki tilda ham faol qo‘llanishini ko‘rsatadi. Biroq ularning strukturaviy tashkil topishi va funksional-semantik xususiyatlarida muayyan tafovutlar mavjud. Ingliz tilida bunday elementlardan, asosan, qo‘shimcha axborotni ixcham shaklda ifodalash hamda sintaktik tuzilmaning iqtisodiyligini ta’minlash maqsadida foydalanilsa, o‘zbek tilida ular badiiy tasvirning ekspressivligini oshirish, obrazlilikni kuchaytirish va muallif yoki qahramonning emotsional munosabatini ifodalashda faolroq namoyon bo‘ladi.

Аннотация

В данной статье в сопоставительном аспекте исследуются особенности употребления элементов, входящих в состав присоединительных конструкций, в художественных текстах английского и узбекского языков. В рамках исследования особое внимание уделяется синтаксической позиции присоединительных элементов в предложении, структурным формам их распространения, их содержательно-информационной нагрузке, а также особенностям их расположения и распределения в структуре художественного текста. Наряду с этим анализируется участие данных единиц в формировании коммуникативной структуры, их роль в обеспечении информационной плотности и возможности реализации различных стилистических функций.

Abstract

This article comparatively examines the patterns of use and distribution of elements forming attached constructions in literary texts in English and Uzbek. The study focuses particular attention on the syntactic position of attached elements within sentences, the structural forms through which they are expanded, their semantic and informational load, and the ways in which they are positioned and distributed throughout literary texts. The study also analyzes the role of these units in shaping communicative structure, maintaining information density, and performing various stylistic functions. The results of the analysis based on English and Uzbek literary texts demonstrate that attached elements are actively used in both languages. However, certain differences can be identified in their structural organization and functional-semantic characteristics. In English, such elements are primarily employed to express additional information in a concise form and to ensure syntactic economy, whereas in Uzbek they are more actively used to enhance the expressiveness of literary representation, strengthen imagery, and convey the emotional attitude of the author or character.

Kalit so'zlar: ilova konstruksiya, ilovali element, yoyilish darajasi, badiiy matn, sintaktik struktura, distributsiya, pragmatika, ingliz tili, o‘zbek tili

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. W. Abraham, German Syntax in Comparison: Foundations of a Typological Syntax of German. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1995, vol. 41.
2. E. Bowman, The Minor and Fragmentary Sentences of a Corpus of Spoken English. Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University, 1966, pp. 1–67.
3. M. Begmatov, Attached Constructions in the German Language. Samarkand, Uzbekistan: Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, 2020, 131 p.
4. Sh. S. Safarov, Pragmalinguistics. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2008, 286 p.
5. L. Bloomfield, Language. London, U.K.: George Allen & Unwin, 1935, 456 p.
6. U. Engel, German Grammar. Heidelberg, Germany: Julius Groos Verlag, 1988, 888 p.
7. A. A. Hill, Introduction to Linguistic Structures. New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1958, 496 p.
8. C. F. Hockett, A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan, 1958, 621 p.
9. R. Posner, Theory of Commenting: A Fundamental Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Athenäum Verlag, 1972, 224 p. The bibliographic record identifies the work as Theorie des Kommentierens: Eine Grundlagenstudie zur Semantik und Pragmatik.
10. A. A. Gaffarov, Syntactic Derivation of Parcellative and Attached Constructions in Modern Uzbek: PhD Dissertation Abstract. Samarkand, Uzbekistan, 1997, 26 p.
11. B. T. Tursunov, Attachment in Modern German. Samarkand, Uzbekistan: Samarkand State University Press, 1988, 82 p. The original bibliographic record confirms the 1988 Samarkand State University publication and 82-page length.
12. V. A. Beloshapkova, Modern Russian Language: Syntax. Moscow, Russia: Vysshaya Shkola, 1977, 248 p.
13. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, U.K.: Longman, 1985, 1779 p.
14. R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 1842 p.
15. M. A. K. Halliday and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2014, 808 p.