BXU Logo

Buxoro Xalqaro
Universiteti

10-tom, 1-son, b. 247–251, Nashr: 2026-10-08

GAPNI BO‘LAKLARGA AJRATISH NAZARIYASI TADQIQI: YANGICHA YONDASHUVLAR

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ТЕОРИИ ЧЛЕНЕНИЯ ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЯ: НОВЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ

A STUDY OF SENTENCE CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS THEORY: NEW APPROACHES

  • Sapayeva Barno Shanazarovna — Ma’mun universiteti G‘arb tillari va adabiyoti kafedrasi dotsenti, PhD barno@mamunedu.uz. · ORCID: 1009-0001-6461-252X

To'liq matn (PDF)

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada gapni bo‘laklarga ajratish nazariyasining shakllanishi, taraqqiyot bosqichlari hamda zamonaviy tilshunoslikdagi yangi yondashuvlari tadqiq etiladi. Gapning sintaktik strukturasini aniqlashda an’anaviy grammatik qarashlar bilan bir qatorda, strukturaviy, semantik, kommunikativ va funksional yondashuvlarning o‘zaro munosabati yoritiladi. Shuningdek, gap bo‘laklarini aniqlashda sintaktik bog‘lanish, grammatik shakl, semantik munosabat, so‘z tartibi va kommunikativ vaziyatning ahamiyati tahlil qilinadi. Turli tizimli tillar materiallari asosida gapning formal va mazmuniy tuzilishini kompleks o‘rganish zarurati asoslanib, sintaktik birliklarni faqat grammatik mezonlar asosida emas, balki ularning kommunikativ va funksional xususiyatlarini hisobga olgan holda tasniflash masalalari ochib beriladi.

Аннотация

В статье исследуются теория членения предложения, основные этапы её становления и развития, а также новые подходы к изучению синтаксической структуры предложения в современном языкознании. Рассматривается взаимосвязь традиционных грамматических представлений со структурным, семантическим, коммуникативным и функциональным подходами. Анализируется роль синтаксической связи, грамматической формы, семантических отношений, порядка слов и коммуникативного контекста в определении членов предложения. На материале разноструктурных языков обосновывается необходимость комплексного изучения формальной и смысловой организации предложения, а также классификации синтаксических единиц с учётом не только грамматических, но и коммуникативно-функциональных характеристик.

Abstract

This article explores the theory of sentence constituent analysis, its major stages of development, and emerging approaches to the study of sentence structure in modern linguistics. It examines the relationship between traditional grammatical perspectives and structural, semantic, communicative, and functional approaches. Particular attention is paid to the role of syntactic relations, grammatical forms, semantic connections, word order, and communicative context in identifying sentence constituents. Drawing on materials from structurally different languages, the study emphasizes the need for a comprehensive analysis of the formal and semantic organization of sentences. It also highlights the importance of classifying syntactic units not only according to grammatical criteria but also in terms of their communicative and functional properties.

Kalit so'zlar: gap, gap bo‘laklari, sintaktik tahlil, sintaktik struktura, an’anaviy grammatika, strukturaviy yondashuv, semantik tahlil, kommunikativ sintaksis, funksional yondashuv, so‘z tartibi, sintaktik munosabat, grammatik mezon, zamonaviy tilshunoslik

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. F. I. Buslaev, Historical Grammar of the Russian Language. Moscow, Russia: Uchpedgiz, 1969, 394 p.
  2. N. S. Valgina, Syntax of the Modern Russian Language. Moscow, Russia: Agar, 2000, pp. 340–382.
  3. G. V. Kolshansky, Logic and Structure of Language. Moscow, Russia: Vysshaya Shkola, 1965, 240 p.
  4. O. I. Moskalskaya, Grammar of Text. Moscow, Russia: Vysshaya Shkola, 1981, 183 p.
  5. A. M. Mukhin, Functional Syntax. St. Petersburg, Russia: Nauka, 1999, 184 p.
  6. A. A. Potebnya, Thought and Language. Moscow, Russia: Pravda, 1965, 228 p.
  7. A. M. Peshkovsky, Russian Syntax in Scientific Interpretation, 7th ed. Moscow, Russia, 1956, 226 p.
  8. Sh. S. Safarov, Principles of Systemic-Semantic Analysis of Syntactic Units. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Tashkent State Pedagogical Institute, 1983, 98 p.
  9. N. Q. Turniyozov, Introduction to the Structural Syntax of the Uzbek Language. Samarkand, Uzbekistan: Samarkand State University, 1989, 76 p.
  10. J. Firbas, “Functions of the question in the process of communication,” Questions of Linguistics, no. 7, Moscow, USSR: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1972, pp. 87–102.
  11. A. A. Kholodovich, “Toward a typology of word order,” Scientific Reports of Higher Education: Philological Sciences, no. 3, Moscow, USSR, 1966, pp. 3–6.
  12. V. S. Khrakovsky, “Passive constructions: Definition, meaning, calculation, and typology,” in Problems of Semantics. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 1974, pp. 127–135.
  13. A. A. Shakhmatov, Syntax of the Russian Language. Leningrad, USSR: Uchpedgiz, 1941, 311 p.
  14. L. Tesnière, Elements of Structural Syntax. Paris, France: Klincksieck, 1959, 670 p.
  15. R. Jakobson, “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics,” in Style in Language, T. A. Sebeok, Ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1960, pp. 350–377.